Thursday 12 April 2012

Thursday 12th April 2012

Went with the rest of the world to the Serpentine for the 'private view' of Hans-Peter Feldman's show  yesterday evening.  Knew he was German, from Dusseldorf  like Joseph Beuys, and was interested in the contents of handbags.  So I was intrigued. 



It's difficult to be truly open and responsive to work when the gallery is crowded and I will go back at a quieter time.  These are my first impressions:

Lots of repetition of things that are the same but different: photographs of lips, photographs of women's knees, photographs of strawberries, paintings by different artists of the sea, brightly painted roman type statues, a wall of  plastic flowerpots complete with plastic flowering plants attached sideways, a few glass cases of similar handbags and their contents, caricature pictures of the artist by various artists and, my favourite part of the show, a darkened room with a line of carousels, each made up of toys, touristy items or bits of ornaments, including the queen and a butterfly, revolving in front of a row of lights contained in coffee tins, creating a wall of constantly dancing and changing shadows.  This was fun and reminded me a little of Christian Boltanski's shadow work but didn't excite me in the same way, partly because the disparate elements of the exhibition didn't add up to a feeling of awe and wonder  .  Feldman's work is manically unserious to the point where some of the ideas lack rigor; who do the handbags belong to - friends? acquaintances? strangers?  It feels as if the show is not quite sure what it is doing - not quite a retrospective (perhaps partly because Feldman destroyed much of his work in the 80s) but not simply current work. 

The Serpentine is probably not the best place for this kind of show - not enough room to leave viewing space around the separate elements. But can't help thinking it would have been possible to create a great show there by leaving a lot of the older work out, perhaps really indulging in a bit more interaction because, at its best,  this work inspires playful thinking.

No comments:

Post a Comment